Share & Bookmark, Press Enter to show all options, press Tab go to next option
Print

FY25–26 Adopted Budget & Fiscal Outlook

The City Council adopted the FY 2025–26 Budget on June 24, 2025. This page centralizes key materials—including Town Hall slides, videos, and the community survey—so residents can review the adopted budget in context, understand long-range fiscal pressures (including the 2027 sunset of Measure E), and track ongoing planning work.

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

Has the City approved a new tax measure?

No. The City Council has not approved placing any new revenue measure on the ballot. With the FY 2025–26 Budget adopted, the City’s focus remains on implementing the adopted budget, maintaining fiscal stability, and continuing community engagement related to long-range planning and the 2027 sunset of Measure E.

Why is the City discussing revenue now?

Palos Verdes Estates is facing growing financial pressures driven by:

  • The scheduled expiration of Measure E in 2027, which currently contributes $5.1 million annually for local law enforcement
  • Rising operational costs, including labor market competitiveness and inflation
  • Aging infrastructure with substantial repair and maintenance needs

The FY 2025–26 budget was adopted after addressing a projected $5.1 million deficit through operational reductions and deferring capital projects. A remaining $1.97 million shortfall was closed using one-time reserves. With Measure E set to expire in 2027 and annual expenditures continuing to outpace revenues, the City is at a critical financial crossroads. 

What is Measure E?

Measure E is a special Law Enforcement Parcel Tax approved by PVE voters in 2018 with 69% support. It:

  • Provides approximately $5.1 million per year for police services
  • Is assessed at $342 per parcel, plus $0.20 per square foot of building improvements
  • Is legally restricted to funding local law enforcement
  • Will sunset after Fiscal Year 2026–27

Measure E has helped sustain some of the PVE Police Department's budget, but the loss of this revenue stream would leave a significant gap in public safety funding.

Can't the City just rely on property taxes, separate from a parcel tax?

No. While property taxes account for about 53% of the City's General Fund revenue, Palos Verdes Estates receives only 11.3 cents of every property tax dollar due to the way funds were allocated under Proposition 13. Most of your property tax dollars go to schools, Los Angeles County, and other special districts.

In cities served by the Los Angeles County Fire District, that District receives an average of 17% of the 1% property tax. But when Proposition 13 passed in 1978, the Fire District was not collecting a designated share of property taxes in Palos Verdes Estates. Because of that, PVE was left out of the Fire District's post-Prop 13 tax structure and does not receive fire protection services through county tax funding.

Instead, the City must pay for its own fire and paramedic services—either from its limited general fund or through a voter-approved special tax.

Other cities also benefit from sales tax revenue or hotel (transient occupancy) taxes, but PVE does not have commercial centers or hotels to generate that kind of income. With limited revenue sources and rising service costs, a locally controlled and reliable funding source is essential to maintain fiscal stability and continue providing core services like fire protection and public safety.

What has the City done to manage costs and balance the budget over the years?

The City has a long history of fiscal prudence and has already:

  • Reduced city's workforce
  • Deferred maintenance, repairs, and capital improvement projects
  • Maintained reserves
  • Secured one-time outside funding i.e. State, Federal, County funding/grants, ARPA

However, most cost-saving strategies have already been implemented, and remaining gaps cannot be closed without risking core services.

Can't the City just make more cuts?

PVE has already stripped its budget to the bone. Additional cuts would impact city services, such as:

  • Police and fire protection
  • Tree Trimming and maintenance
  • Wildfire prevention and storm response
  • Emergency preparedness and infrastructure repair

PVE also risks losing qualified staff to neighboring cities offering more competitive pay, increasing reliance on costly contract services, and weakening institutional knowledge.

Can donations or fundraising support City services?

While appreciated, donations and grants cannot provide the consistent, predictable revenue necessary to fund essential services such as police, fire, and infrastructure. These require stable funding commitments.

Why consider a parcel tax again—why not other options?

The City has and continues to evaluate a range of options, including:

  • Adjusted or renewed parcel tax (potentially expanded to cover fire services)
  • Utility Users Tax
  • Sales Tax
  • Transient Occupancy Tax
  • Property related fees for sewer and storm drain maintenance
  • Grants and partnerships
  • Paid parking
  • Large scale special events

However, other options such as hotel taxes or real estate transfer taxes are not viable due to the City's structure or lack of commercial lodging. A parcel tax remains the most practical, locally controlled option to generate meaningful revenue.

What is the current deficit?

FY 2025–26 adopted budget:

  • Revenues: $25.2 Million (includes $5.1 million from Measure E)
  • Expenditures: $27.2 Million 
  • Deficit: $1.97 million (Adopted FY 25-26 budget)
  • The City Council adopted a budget for FY 25–26 that relies on reserves to close a $1.97 Million gap, highlighting the need for long-term solutions. 

What happens when Measure E expires in 2027?

If not renewed or replaced:

  • The City will lose $5.1 million annually in public safety funding
  • Reserves could be exhausted in less than two years
  • Significant service cuts would be required, especially in police, fire, and emergency operations
Is Measure E funding used for anything besides police?

No. Measure E is restricted to law enforcement and currently funds approximately 65% of the Police Department's $7.84 million FY 2024–25 budget.

What services are considered essential?

Core services include:

  • Police, fire, and 911 emergency response
  • Infrastructure maintenance (streets, sewers, drainage)
  • Wildfire prevention and weed abatement
  • Neighborhood and parkland upkeep
  • Public Works, emergency preparedness, and community safety programs
How is the City engaging residents in this process?

The City is committed to transparency and public input. Engagement efforts include:

  • Community surveys
  • Budget study sessions
  • Town Halls and public meetings
  • Regular website updates and newsletters
How can I provide feedback or ask more questions?

Residents are encouraged to:

Will future revenue be used for a new Civic Center?

No. There are no current proposals to fund or construct a new City Hall, Police Station, or Civic Center. Any new revenue would be directed to preserving core services and addressing infrastructure needs.

Why can't the Golf Club, Beach Club, Tennis Club, Stables (Concessions) cover the shortfall?

The four City Concessions provide world class amenities and recreational opportunities to city residents. They are all owned by the city and operated under a concession agreement. Through these agreements concessions are required to provide 10% of their revenue to the city resulting in approximately $2 million dollars in revenue. The current agreements run for many more years. Under the terms of these agreements, the City does not control day-to-day operations or the club's financial structure.

Why is $16.4 million in new revenue being discussed?

This number represents an estimate based on the City's need to address the operating deficit that is immediately created when Measure E sunsets. The $16.4 million estimate includes approximately $4 million for maintaining critical infrastructure and services. These funds would be allocated over time to stabilize City finances and address long-deferred needs.

Why is there a $2 million deficit in the adopted budget?

The deficit results from:

  • Rising costs for fire services and law enforcement
  • Competitive staffing pressures
  • Inflation-driven increases in materials and services
  • Lack of diversified revenue streams

    This is despite a history of prudent budgeting and cost-saving strategies. This was predicted and identified in both the Long-Term forecast released in early 2025 and the adopted budget.

FY 2025–26 Adopted Budget

FY 2025–26 Adopted Budget Cover View / Download FY 2025–26 Budget

April 15 Town Hall Presentation Slides

View / Download the Slides

June 17 Long-Range Fiscal Planning Workshop

View / Download the Slides

July 1 Town Hall Presentation Slides

View / Download the Slides

July 1 Town Hall Supporting Attachments

View / Download the Document

Community Survey Presentation

View / Download Survey Slides

Videos

April 15 Town Hall (Full)

April 15 Town Hall (1-Hour Cut)

June 17 Long-Range Fiscal Planning Workshop

July 1 Town Hall #2